Weight-bearing tracking service to control the load on the injured leg during rehabilitation
ComeBack Mobility™ FDA Registration Number: 10083584 All rights reserved 2020-2026 Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Specification Developer Office:
700 N St Mary's Street, Floor 14, Office 65,
San Antonio, TX, 78205, US
Contact us:
popov@comebackmobility.com
9 am - 6 pm CT
LLC "FISON." Contract Manufacture Office:
Batumska street 11, Office 211,
Dnipro, 49074, Ukraine
For inquiries regarding collaboration on
clinical study in Ukraine, contact us at:
+380-(98)-336-37-03
help@comebackmobility.com
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07092579
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07134257
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07138066
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ws2JMgMo_Tcaceg1YNZ89r5_8mwm7_1C/edit?tab=t.0
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Modified weight-bearing recommendations are commonly prescribed after surgical intervention for injuries to the lower extremity to reduce the risk of nonunion and delayed healing associated with load bearing through the injured limb and to combat the deleterious effects of immobility. The physical therapist (PT) in the acute care setting is likely to instruct patients after lower extremity injury in weight-bearing-restricted ambulation. A new device is now available for use in the training of weight-bearing status. The study examines whether the ComeBack Mobility crutch tip reporting weight-bearing on the lower extremity is a reliable and valid tool in determining force when compared with the gold standard force plate measurement of lower extremity weight-bearing.
Previous studies have shown that patients are often not able to adequately learn or adhere to restrictive weight-bearing modifications. This may be due to an inability to provide immediate and ongoing feedback on weight-bearing. The new ComeBack Mobility crutch tip system is now available for the acute care PT to use in instruction and for patients to receive real-time feedback throughout their rehabilitation process.
A sample of convenience of 6 able-bodied PTs was used.
Each subject performed 30 trials of axillary crutch-assisted weight-bearing ambulation using the new device. The weight-bearing reported by the device was compared with the weight-bearing measured through force plates via correlations, t tests, and Bland-Altman plot.
The new device demonstrated moderate-good reliability in the measurement of non-weight-bearing and 50% partial weight-bearing in trials completed.
The ComeBack Mobility crutch tip system could be useful and should be considered for clinical use as a reliable and valid tool in providing auditory feedback for compliance to a prescribed weight-bearing protocol. The system could be useful in the training of patients in the first use of crutches such as prior to discharge from an acute care hospital. Further research is needed with clinical populations as well as with varied weight-bearing protocols.
Abstract The present review acknowledges the tremendous impact of Stephan Perren’s strain theory, considered with respect to the earlier contributions of Roux and Pauwels. Then, it provides further insight by examining how the concept of reverse dynamisation extended Perren’s theory within a modern context. A key factor of this more contemporary theory is that it introduces variable mechanical conditions at different time points during bone healing, opening the possibility of manipulating biology through mechanics to achieve the desired clinical outcome. The discussion focusses on the current state of the art and the most recent advances made towards and accelerating bone regeneration, by actively controlling the mechanical environment as healing progresses. Reverse dynamisation utilises a very specific mechanical manipulation regimen, with conditions initially flexible to encourage and expedite early callus formation. Once callus has formed, the mechanical conditions are intentionally modified to create a rigid environment under which the soft callus is quickly converted to hard callus, bridging the fracture site and leading to a more rapid union. The relevant literature, principally animal studies, was surveyed to provide ample evidence in support of the effectiveness of reverse dynamisation. By providing a modern perspective on Stephan Perren’s strain theory, reverse dynamisation perhaps holds the key to tipping the balance in favour of a more rapid and reliable union when treating acute fractures, osteotomies, non-unions and other circumstances where it is necessary to regenerate bone.
Keywords: Reverse dynamisation, dynamisation, interfragmentary strain theory, bone healing, fracture healing, mechanical environment, fixation stability, animal models.
Address for correspondence: Vaida Glatt, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Centre San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
Telephone number: +1 2104508094 Email: glatt@uthscsa.edu
Copyright policy: This article is distributed in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).
Predict the course & type of fracture healing!
Abstract A new quantitative tissue di¤erentiation theory which relates the local tissue formation in a fracture gap to the local stress and strain is presented. Our hypothesisproposes that the amounts ofstrain and hydrostaticpressure along existing calciÞedsurfaces in the fracture callus determine the di¤erentiation of the callus tissue. The study compares the local strains and stresses in the callus as calculated from a Þnite element model with histological Þndings from an animal fracture model. The hypothesis predicts intramem branousboneformationforstrains smallerapproximately$5%andhydrostaticpressuressmaller than $0.15 MPa.Endochondral ossiÞcation is associated with compressive pressures larger than about !0.15 MPa and strains smaller than $15%. All other conditions seemed to lead to connective tissue or Þbrous cartilage. The hypothesis enables a better understanding of the complex tissue di¤erentiation seen in histological images and the mechanical conditions for healing delayed healing or nonunions. ( 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Bone healing; Mechanical stimuli; Tissue di¤erentiation
If strain goes beyond certain limits – it slows down the healing process!
Controlled Mechanical Stimulation in the Treatment of Tibia1 Fractures.pdf – Google Диск
Abstract Although it is known that the mechanical environment affects the fracture healing process, the optimal conditions for the different stages of healing have not been defined. In the present studies, the influence of applying a very short period of axial micromovement with defined characteristics to healing fractures has been studied both in simulated and clinical tibial fractures. The fracture healing process is seen to be acutely sensitive to small periods of daily strain applied axially within two weeks of fracture. There are boundaries of strain magnitude and force of application of applied movement that, if exceeded, inhibit the healing process. The application of appropriate applied strain to clinical tibial fractures at a time shortly after injury, when most patients would be very inactive, appears to enhance the healing process when using external skeletal fixation.Abstract Non-union rate after tibial fractures remains high. Apart from largely uncontrollable biologic, injury, and patient-specific factors, the mechanical fracture environment is a key determinant of healing. Our aim was to establish a patient-specific simulation workflow to determine the mechanical fracture environment and allow for an estimation of its healing potential. In a referred patient with failed nail-osteosynthesis after tibial-shaft fracture exchange nailing was performed. Post-operative CT-scans were used to construct a three-dimensional model of the treatment situation in an image processing and computer-aided design system. Resulting forces, computed in a simulation-driven workflow based on patient monitoring and motion capturing were used to simulate the mechanical fracture environment before and after exchange nailing. Implant stresses for the initial and revision situation, as well as interfragmentary movement, resulting hydrostatic, and octahedral shear strain were calculated and compared to the clinical course. The simulation model was able to adequately predict hardware stresses in the initial situation where mechanical implant failure occurred. Furthermore, hydrostatic and octahedral shear strain of the revision situation were calculated to be within published healing boundaries—accordingly the fracture healed uneventfully. Our workflow is able to determine the mechanical environment of a fracture fixation, calculate implant stresses, interfragmentary movement, and the resulting strain. Critical mechanical boundary conditions for fracture healing can be determined in relation to individual loading parameters. Based on this individualized treatment recommendations during the early post-operative phase in lower leg fractures are possible in order to prevent implant failure and non-union development.