Help patients adhere weight-bearing protocols to enhance bone healing & prevent fixation failure. These protocols reduce complications that lead to reoperations, generating additional revenue for practices and savings for payers.


1. *CBM create 3D model from a post-op CT scan & calculate what load help the bone heal without compromising fixation

2. via *CBM app prescribe personalized load for the patient & remotely monitors compliance

3. Patient use *CBM app & FDA cleared Crutch Tips to follow the prescribed loading plan.

1. *CBM create 3D model from a post-op CT scan & calculate what load help the bone heal without compromising fixation

2. via *CBM app prescribe personalized load for the patient & remotely monitors compliance

3. Patient use *CBM app & FDA cleared Crutch Tips to follow the prescribed loading plan.
in their rehabilitation
axial load
step data
of pain and swelling
in their rehabilitation
axial load
step data
of pain and swelling
Weight-bearing as tolerated is not always safe!
Individualized Determination of the Mechanical Fracture Environment After Tibial Exchange Nailing—A Simulation-Based Feasibility Study
Benedikt J. Braun, Marcel Orth, Stefan Diebels, Kerstin Wickert, Annchristin Andres, Joshua Gawlitza, Arno Bücker, Tim Pohlemann, Michael Roland (2021)
Weight-bearing as tolerated is not always safe!
Case:
A 55-year-old woman broke a leg, 7 weeks after surgery, the metal piece used to fix her bone broke, and her leg broke again
Why It Happen?
Researchers found that too much load during walking caused the implant to fail

Applying Right Amount Of Strain Improves Healing!
If strain goes beyond certain limits – it slows down the healing process!
Controlled Mechanical Stimulation in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures
John Kenwright, Ph.D., F.R.C.S., And Allen E. Goodship,H.D., D.V.Sc., M.R.C.V.S., (1988)
Applying Right Amount Of Strain Improves Healing!
If strain goes beyond certain limits – it slows down the healing process!


Magnitudes of local stress & strain along bony surfaces
Predict the course & type of fracture healing!
Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing
L.E. Claes, C.A. Heigele, (1999)
Magnitudes of local stress & strain along bony surfaces
Predict the course & type of fracture healing!
Dependence of healing on mechanical conditions:
Strain <5% & pressure <0.15 MPa → intramembranous bone formation.
Pressure ≈0.15 MPa → endochondral ossification.
High strain and pressure → fibrous tissue or cartilage.
Optimal interfragmentary mobility:
Initial mobility of ~1.2 mm stimulates callus formation. (IFM)
Gradual reduction of IFM due to increasing callus stiffness.

Reverse Dynamisation Boosts Healing by Controlling Strain
Reverse Dynamisation: A Modern Perspective On Stephan Perren’s Strain Theory
V. Glatt, C.H. Evans and K. Tetsworth, (2021)
Reverse Dynamisation Boosts Healing by Controlling Strain

Early Fracture Activity is Crucial for Bone Regeneration
The relation between fracture activity and bone healing with special reference to the early healing phase – A preclinical study
Markus Windolf, Manuela Ernst, Ronald Schwyn, Daniel Arens, Stephan Zeiter, (2021)
Early Fracture Activity is Crucial for Bone Regeneration


Validation Testing of a New Crutch Tip Biofeedback Device for Prescribed Lower Extremity Weight-Bearing
Kevin E. Brueilly, Amanda M. Feller, Jonathan M. Ahearn, Jonathan S. Goodwin (January 2024.)


The ComeBack Mobility crutch tip system could be useful and should be considered for clinical use as a reliable and valid tool in providing auditory feedback for compliance to a prescribed weight-bearing protocol.
ComeBack Mobility Crutch Tip System
Improves patients weight-bearing compliance and satisfaction!
Smart Crutch Tips Enhance Weight-Bearing Adherence and Usability in Home-Based Rehabilitation (July 2025)
ComeBack Mobility Crutch Tip System
Improves patients weight-bearing compliance and satisfaction!
Weight-bearing compliance:
73.60% in Intervention group vs. 21.10% in Control group.
Usability:
SUS score of 84.25 – “Excellent Usability.” Patient Satisfaction: 10/10 likelihood to recommend the device.

Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing in Patients Recovering From Tibial Shaft Fractures
Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing in Patients Recovering From Extra-Articular Proximal Tibia Fractures
Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing in Patients Recovering From Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures
Individualized Determination of the Mechanical Fracture Environment After Tibial Exchange Nailing—A Simulation-Based Feasibility Study
Benedikt et al.

Controlled Mechanical Stimulation in the Treatment of Tibial Fractures
Kenwright et al.

Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing
Kenwright et al.

Reverse Dynamisation:
A Modern Perspective On Stephan Perren’s Strain Theory
Glattet al.

The relation between fracture activity and bone healing with special reference to the early healing phase – A preclinical study
Windolf et al.

Validation Testing of a New Crutch Tip Biofeedback Device for Prescribed Lower Extremity Weight-Bearing
Comeback Mobility Inc

Smart Crutch Tips Enhance Weight-Bearing Adherence and Usability in Home-Based Rehabilitation (July 2025)
Comeback Mobility Inc

Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing
in Patients Recovering From Tibial Shaft
Fractures
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT07092579
Comeback Mobility Inc

Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing in Patients Recovering From Extra-Articular Proximal Tibia Fractures
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT07134257
Comeback Mobility Inc

Smart Crutch Tips for Guided Weight-Bearing in Patients Recovering From Extra-Articular Distal Tibia Fractures
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT07138066
Comeback Mobility Inc

With Smart Crutch Tips, your doctor can monitor the course of rehabilitation and help you avoid complications
a) loosening of osseous retainer screws
b) migration of screws or spokes
c) loosening of intramedullary retainer locking screws
d) loosening of the intramedullary shaft
e) loosening of the blade of the osseous plate or blocked epiphyseal screws (LCP, DHS, DCS systems)
f) teething of wire seam
a) deformation of the plate
b) deformation of the intramedullary shaft
c) deformation of the locking screws of the intramedullary retainer
a) loosening or teething of spokes or transosseous rods of an external fixer
b) fracture of spokes or transosseous rods of an external fixator
c) destabilization or damage to the external structure of the AVF
a) transplant migration
b) transplant fracture
c) fixation migration after consolidation is completed
a) vein thrombosis of the lower extremities
b) thromboembolic complications
c) muscle and joint contractures
d) muscle weakness and muscle volume reduction
e) gait stereotype disturbances
a) fixation plates and screws break muscle weakness
b) Dislocation of prosthesis joint contractures
c) Bone density loss gait disturbances
d) Blood clots
e) Muscle atrophy
Orthopedic Trauma Surgery
Chief of Trauma Division in NYU Langone Health
23+ Yrs Experience
“It gives them immediate feedback and teaches them had to weight bear properly and follow up the follows a program that I prescribed gives me feedback”
CSU Prof. & Assoc. Director Physical Therapy
![]()
“It gives everybody an opportunity to just have some more feedback”
Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands. Does research in Surgery and Traumatology. Current project – ‘Permissive weight bearing’
“With the feedback patients gets from the Crutches, they will back to walk 8 weeks sooner”
Doctor of Physical Therapy, Regional Director
Moriarty Physical Therapy
![]()
“The biggest issue for me is that people aren’t listening, so it’s an issue of not enough pressure or too much pressure. With teenagers it’s a little bit less of «too much», it’s a matter of putting enough weight to it, so I can track it. I can see their percent, so when they come I can say: «Hey, you are not doing enough. You’ve make a thousand steps the first week and week 2 you kinda fall off. You have to stop your game up and get more compliance to put more pressure or ask them not to put too much pressure”
PT, DPT, CSCS, USAW, SFMA, TPI, Clinical Director Professional Care Physical Therapy
![]()
“The issue arise is that one the patient foot is out of the scale, really there is no other way to tell how much weight they are actually putting. There is no objective medical founded”
With Smart Crutch Tips, your doctor can monitor the course of rehabilitation and help you avoid complications
a) loosening of osseous retainer screws
b) migration of screws or spokes
c) loosening of intramedullary retainer locking screws
d) loosening of the intramedullary shaft
e) loosening of the blade of the osseous plate or blocked epiphyseal screws (LCP, DHS, DCS systems)
f) teething of wire seam
a) deformation of the plate
b) deformation of the intramedullary shaft
c) deformation of the locking screws of the intramedullary retainer
a) loosening or teething of spokes or transosseous rods of an external fixer
b) fracture of spokes or transosseous rods of an external fixator
c) destabilization or damage to the external structure of the AVF
a) fixation plates and screws break muscle weakness
b) Dislocation of prosthesis joint contractures
c) Bone density loss gait disturbances
d) Blood clots
e) Muscle atrophy
a) transplant migration
b) transplant fracture
c) fixation migration after consolidation is completed
a) vein thrombosis of the lower extremities
b) thromboembolic complications
c) muscle and joint contractures
d) muscle weakness and muscle volume reduction
e) gait stereotype disturbances
Regarding the physicians using our product, we have been working with orthopedic surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in several leading healthcare institutions.
The idea of attaching Smart Tips to crutches was tested with real patients, and unlike insoles, Smart Crutch Tips are:
– Always with the patient, even at night, when the patient is barefoot
– More durable – 3 years of use
– Available to consumers of any age and shoe size
– More affordable to implement
– Fit the reusable model
When walking on crutches, there is a moment during which the healthy leg is completed lifted off the ground and the entire load is distributed between the crutches and the injured leg.
We can determine how much load is placed on the injured limb by subtracting the amount of weight on the crutches from the patient’s body weight. For example: if a patient’s weight is 80 kg and during a step he transferred 60 kg to crutches, then 20kg of pressure was exerted on the injured limb.
The accuracy of Smart Crutch Tips is 98,5%.
The amount of initial weight bearing can be set from 0% NWB to 50% PWB. The upper threshold for graduated WBAT is 80%.
The Smart Crutch Tips device can be used by patients recovering from nonsurgical and surgical treatments for hip, thigh, knee, shin, ankle, and foot injuries and pathologies
Yes, Canes with diameters from 17 to 30mm. A patients can begin their gait rehabilitation on crutches and switch to a cane for quality gait progression.
No, it doesn’t need FDA approval. It’s Medical Device class II, 501 (k) Exempt. It’s FDA registered and has all necessary regulatory approvals for official sales in the US market.
Yes, it’s covered by insurance. The device usage itself doesn’t cover due to new technology on the market. However, the doctors work is covered. So they can get additional money for device setup and biofeedback patient training and Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM).
– Yes. We change the devices if anything happens during patient usage.
– Warranty for hospitals – 1 year.
– However, we can provide an expanded warranty for hospitals for up to 3 years.
Yes, it has protection from dust and water – IP 54. It can be used while rain or snow and operates in temperatures: from 5F to 86F.
Weight-bearing tracking service to control the load on the injured leg during rehabilitation
ComeBack Mobility™ FDA Registration Number: 10083584 All rights reserved 2020-2026 Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Specification Developer Office:
700 N St Mary's Street, Floor 14, Office 65,
San Antonio, TX, 78205, US
Contact us:
popov@comebackmobility.com
9 am - 6 pm CT
LLC "FISON." Contract Manufacture Office:
Batumska street 11, Office 211,
Dnipro, 49074, Ukraine
For inquiries regarding collaboration on
clinical study in Ukraine, contact us at:
+380-(98)-336-37-03
help@comebackmobility.com
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07092579
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07134257
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT07138066
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ws2JMgMo_Tcaceg1YNZ89r5_8mwm7_1C/edit?tab=t.0
Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy
Modified weight-bearing recommendations are commonly prescribed after surgical intervention for injuries to the lower extremity to reduce the risk of nonunion and delayed healing associated with load bearing through the injured limb and to combat the deleterious effects of immobility. The physical therapist (PT) in the acute care setting is likely to instruct patients after lower extremity injury in weight-bearing-restricted ambulation. A new device is now available for use in the training of weight-bearing status. The study examines whether the ComeBack Mobility crutch tip reporting weight-bearing on the lower extremity is a reliable and valid tool in determining force when compared with the gold standard force plate measurement of lower extremity weight-bearing.
Previous studies have shown that patients are often not able to adequately learn or adhere to restrictive weight-bearing modifications. This may be due to an inability to provide immediate and ongoing feedback on weight-bearing. The new ComeBack Mobility crutch tip system is now available for the acute care PT to use in instruction and for patients to receive real-time feedback throughout their rehabilitation process.
A sample of convenience of 6 able-bodied PTs was used.
Each subject performed 30 trials of axillary crutch-assisted weight-bearing ambulation using the new device. The weight-bearing reported by the device was compared with the weight-bearing measured through force plates via correlations, t tests, and Bland-Altman plot.
The new device demonstrated moderate-good reliability in the measurement of non-weight-bearing and 50% partial weight-bearing in trials completed.
The ComeBack Mobility crutch tip system could be useful and should be considered for clinical use as a reliable and valid tool in providing auditory feedback for compliance to a prescribed weight-bearing protocol. The system could be useful in the training of patients in the first use of crutches such as prior to discharge from an acute care hospital. Further research is needed with clinical populations as well as with varied weight-bearing protocols.
Abstract The present review acknowledges the tremendous impact of Stephan Perren’s strain theory, considered with respect to the earlier contributions of Roux and Pauwels. Then, it provides further insight by examining how the concept of reverse dynamisation extended Perren’s theory within a modern context. A key factor of this more contemporary theory is that it introduces variable mechanical conditions at different time points during bone healing, opening the possibility of manipulating biology through mechanics to achieve the desired clinical outcome. The discussion focusses on the current state of the art and the most recent advances made towards and accelerating bone regeneration, by actively controlling the mechanical environment as healing progresses. Reverse dynamisation utilises a very specific mechanical manipulation regimen, with conditions initially flexible to encourage and expedite early callus formation. Once callus has formed, the mechanical conditions are intentionally modified to create a rigid environment under which the soft callus is quickly converted to hard callus, bridging the fracture site and leading to a more rapid union. The relevant literature, principally animal studies, was surveyed to provide ample evidence in support of the effectiveness of reverse dynamisation. By providing a modern perspective on Stephan Perren’s strain theory, reverse dynamisation perhaps holds the key to tipping the balance in favour of a more rapid and reliable union when treating acute fractures, osteotomies, non-unions and other circumstances where it is necessary to regenerate bone.
Keywords: Reverse dynamisation, dynamisation, interfragmentary strain theory, bone healing, fracture healing, mechanical environment, fixation stability, animal models.
Address for correspondence: Vaida Glatt, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Centre San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MC 7774, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
Telephone number: +1 2104508094 Email: glatt@uthscsa.edu
Copyright policy: This article is distributed in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).
Predict the course & type of fracture healing!
Abstract A new quantitative tissue di¤erentiation theory which relates the local tissue formation in a fracture gap to the local stress and strain is presented. Our hypothesisproposes that the amounts ofstrain and hydrostaticpressure along existing calciÞedsurfaces in the fracture callus determine the di¤erentiation of the callus tissue. The study compares the local strains and stresses in the callus as calculated from a Þnite element model with histological Þndings from an animal fracture model. The hypothesis predicts intramem branousboneformationforstrains smallerapproximately$5%andhydrostaticpressuressmaller than $0.15 MPa.Endochondral ossiÞcation is associated with compressive pressures larger than about !0.15 MPa and strains smaller than $15%. All other conditions seemed to lead to connective tissue or Þbrous cartilage. The hypothesis enables a better understanding of the complex tissue di¤erentiation seen in histological images and the mechanical conditions for healing delayed healing or nonunions. ( 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Bone healing; Mechanical stimuli; Tissue di¤erentiation
If strain goes beyond certain limits – it slows down the healing process!
Controlled Mechanical Stimulation in the Treatment of Tibia1 Fractures.pdf – Google Диск
Abstract Although it is known that the mechanical environment affects the fracture healing process, the optimal conditions for the different stages of healing have not been defined. In the present studies, the influence of applying a very short period of axial micromovement with defined characteristics to healing fractures has been studied both in simulated and clinical tibial fractures. The fracture healing process is seen to be acutely sensitive to small periods of daily strain applied axially within two weeks of fracture. There are boundaries of strain magnitude and force of application of applied movement that, if exceeded, inhibit the healing process. The application of appropriate applied strain to clinical tibial fractures at a time shortly after injury, when most patients would be very inactive, appears to enhance the healing process when using external skeletal fixation.Abstract Non-union rate after tibial fractures remains high. Apart from largely uncontrollable biologic, injury, and patient-specific factors, the mechanical fracture environment is a key determinant of healing. Our aim was to establish a patient-specific simulation workflow to determine the mechanical fracture environment and allow for an estimation of its healing potential. In a referred patient with failed nail-osteosynthesis after tibial-shaft fracture exchange nailing was performed. Post-operative CT-scans were used to construct a three-dimensional model of the treatment situation in an image processing and computer-aided design system. Resulting forces, computed in a simulation-driven workflow based on patient monitoring and motion capturing were used to simulate the mechanical fracture environment before and after exchange nailing. Implant stresses for the initial and revision situation, as well as interfragmentary movement, resulting hydrostatic, and octahedral shear strain were calculated and compared to the clinical course. The simulation model was able to adequately predict hardware stresses in the initial situation where mechanical implant failure occurred. Furthermore, hydrostatic and octahedral shear strain of the revision situation were calculated to be within published healing boundaries—accordingly the fracture healed uneventfully. Our workflow is able to determine the mechanical environment of a fracture fixation, calculate implant stresses, interfragmentary movement, and the resulting strain. Critical mechanical boundary conditions for fracture healing can be determined in relation to individual loading parameters. Based on this individualized treatment recommendations during the early post-operative phase in lower leg fractures are possible in order to prevent implant failure and non-union development.